This paper investigates a peculiar moment of the Latin reception of the Arabophone theologian and philosopher Abū Ḥāmid al-Ġazālī (d. 1111) in the works of Albert the Great (d. 1280). It focuses primarily on a rather atypical remark in Albert’s commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, which accurately describes al-Ġazālī as opposing the theory of the eternity of the world, and as the source, in connection with Moses Maimonides (d. 1204), of a particular philosophical argument concerning potentiality in the debate on the theory. Furthermore, it takes into account another peculiar description of al-Ġazālī offered in Albert’s Super Ethica, in which the Islamic thinker known in Europe as the most faithful follower of Avicenna is startlingly portrayed as a Jewish theologian. With the tools of doctrinal, philological, and broadly historical analysis, the paper investigates three interconnected but separate questions : (1) how Albert could have known that al-Ġazālī actually denied the eternity of the world, as opposed to the common view of the Latin Algazel as a believer in it ; (2) how Albert could have known about al-Ġazālī’s argument on potentiality, given that the source was an as yet untranslated work (al-Ġazālī’s Tahāfut al-falāsifa); and (3) what could account for the fact that Albert returned in later works to regarding al-Ġazālī as accepting the world’s eternity.

Unus de intelligentibus postremis loquentibus. Noteworthy Aspects of the Reception of al-Ġazālī in Albert the Great

Marco Signori
2020-01-01

Abstract

This paper investigates a peculiar moment of the Latin reception of the Arabophone theologian and philosopher Abū Ḥāmid al-Ġazālī (d. 1111) in the works of Albert the Great (d. 1280). It focuses primarily on a rather atypical remark in Albert’s commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, which accurately describes al-Ġazālī as opposing the theory of the eternity of the world, and as the source, in connection with Moses Maimonides (d. 1204), of a particular philosophical argument concerning potentiality in the debate on the theory. Furthermore, it takes into account another peculiar description of al-Ġazālī offered in Albert’s Super Ethica, in which the Islamic thinker known in Europe as the most faithful follower of Avicenna is startlingly portrayed as a Jewish theologian. With the tools of doctrinal, philological, and broadly historical analysis, the paper investigates three interconnected but separate questions : (1) how Albert could have known that al-Ġazālī actually denied the eternity of the world, as opposed to the common view of the Latin Algazel as a believer in it ; (2) how Albert could have known about al-Ġazālī’s argument on potentiality, given that the source was an as yet untranslated work (al-Ġazālī’s Tahāfut al-falāsifa); and (3) what could account for the fact that Albert returned in later works to regarding al-Ġazālī as accepting the world’s eternity.
2020
Albert the Great, Albertus Magnus, al-Ġazālī, Scholastic philosophy, Arabic philosophy, reception, quotations, Moses Maimonides
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020c Unus de intelligentibus - Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 285.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
285.23 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11771/25279
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
social impact