The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of ‘liberating’ ancient monuments and paving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical monuments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar ‘liberation’ treatment within the cityscape, “case medioevali” and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruction of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larger projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Rome’s medieval domestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments.

Behind the Roman Monument: Case Medioevali as Case Study

Michal Lynn Shumate
2021-01-01

Abstract

The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of ‘liberating’ ancient monuments and paving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical monuments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar ‘liberation’ treatment within the cityscape, “case medioevali” and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruction of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larger projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Rome’s medieval domestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
archimaera9_shumate.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 8.6 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.6 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11771/26798
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact