We explore economic incentives for third parties to intervene in ongoing internal wars. We develop a three-party model of the decision to intervene in conflict that highlights the role of the economic benefits accruing from the intervention and the potential costs. We present novel empirical results on the role of oil in motivating third-party military intervention. We find that the likelihood of a third-party intervention increases when (a) the country at war has large reserves of oil, (b) the relative competition in the sector is limited, and (c) the potential intervener has a higher demand for oil.

“Oil above Water”: Economic Interdependence and Third-party Intervention

Bove V.;
2016-01-01

Abstract

We explore economic incentives for third parties to intervene in ongoing internal wars. We develop a three-party model of the decision to intervene in conflict that highlights the role of the economic benefits accruing from the intervention and the potential costs. We present novel empirical results on the role of oil in motivating third-party military intervention. We find that the likelihood of a third-party intervention increases when (a) the country at war has large reserves of oil, (b) the relative competition in the sector is limited, and (c) the potential intervener has a higher demand for oil.
2016
intrastate conflict
third-party intervention
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bove Gleditsch Sekeris JCR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 254.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
254.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11771/30752
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
social impact