This paper explores, theoretically and empirically, how governments may use the tradeoff between social and military expenditure to advance their electoral and partisan objectives. Three key results emerge. First, governments tend to bias outlays towards social expenditure and away from military expenditure at election times. Second, the size of this tradeoff is larger when we exclude countries involved in conflict, where national security plays an important role on voter choice. Third, while certain categories of social expenditure are higher during left administrations, military expenditure is higher during right administrations.

Political cycles in public expenditure: butter vs guns

Bove V.;
2017-01-01

Abstract

This paper explores, theoretically and empirically, how governments may use the tradeoff between social and military expenditure to advance their electoral and partisan objectives. Three key results emerge. First, governments tend to bias outlays towards social expenditure and away from military expenditure at election times. Second, the size of this tradeoff is larger when we exclude countries involved in conflict, where national security plays an important role on voter choice. Third, while certain categories of social expenditure are higher during left administrations, military expenditure is higher during right administrations.
2017
Elections
Military expenditure
Partisanship
Social expenditure
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bove Efthyvoulou Navas JCE.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 341.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
341.8 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S0147596716300038-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 810.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
810.25 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11771/30843
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 73
social impact