Hubert Dreyfus questioned the foundational ideas of early artificial intelligence research. Challenging the prevailing orthodoxy, he posited that the failure to manifest advancements in areas like language translation and problem-solving stems from a foundational misalignment with the intricacies of human “information processing”. This paper restates Dreyfus’ challenge. Based on case studies it argues that contemporary neural network systems have taken up the challenge by implicitly addressing three distinct philosophical problems, posed by Ludwig Wittgenstein, George Pólya, and Edmund Husserl.

Machine Translation: Early Criticisms Revisited

Perini Brogi, Cosimo
;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Hubert Dreyfus questioned the foundational ideas of early artificial intelligence research. Challenging the prevailing orthodoxy, he posited that the failure to manifest advancements in areas like language translation and problem-solving stems from a foundational misalignment with the intricacies of human “information processing”. This paper restates Dreyfus’ challenge. Based on case studies it argues that contemporary neural network systems have taken up the challenge by implicitly addressing three distinct philosophical problems, posed by Ludwig Wittgenstein, George Pólya, and Edmund Husserl.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
3701268.3701286.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 560.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
560.03 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11771/31798
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact