In this paper we investigate the consequences of introducing a cost to observe the signal in an otherwise standard signaling game. Beyond identifying equilibria, which we contrast with those of a standard signaling game, we study their robustness to two important classes of refinements: acting through restrictions on out-of-equilibrium beliefs and through trembles. Our results suggest that more prominence should be given to the pooling outcome on the minimum signal.
Signaling with costly acquisition of signals / Bilancini, E; Boncinelli, L. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION. - ISSN 0167-2681. - 145:(2018), pp. 141-150. [10.1016/j.jebo.2017.10.022]
Signaling with costly acquisition of signals
Bilancini E;
2018
Abstract
In this paper we investigate the consequences of introducing a cost to observe the signal in an otherwise standard signaling game. Beyond identifying equilibria, which we contrast with those of a standard signaling game, we study their robustness to two important classes of refinements: acting through restrictions on out-of-equilibrium beliefs and through trembles. Our results suggest that more prominence should be given to the pooling outcome on the minimum signal.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
bibosign_JEBO.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
519.1 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
519.1 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

